> The term "Object Safety" is like a "Guinea Pig" — not a pig, and not from Guinea.
ごもっともすぎる
Object Safety is a terrible term - documentation - Rust Internals https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/object-safety-is-a-terrible-term/21025
Rust Internals · Object Safety is a terrible termedit: this has been fixed! Meeting proposal: rename "object safety" to "dyn compatibility" · Issue #286 · rust-lang/lang-team · GitHub The term "Object Safety" is like a "Guinea Pig" — not a pig, and not from Guinea. Rust isn't a typical OOP language, so what is an "Object" (in the broad meaning) in Rust is unclear, and could be multiple things depending on one's interpretation. However, Object Safety is not about any objects, it's about traits. It's an abbreviated version of "Trait-Object S...
同様に object っていうけど典型的な OOP のそれじゃなくて trait object だし safe も 別に Rust の safe/unsafe とは関係ないのに使われてて新参に優しくないねみたいなことが言及されている
> Object Safety uses a colloquial meaning of safety unrelated to Rust's primary concept of safe/unsafe.
> That's a very unfortunate choice given how important the other kind of safety is to Rust.
safety 関連の単語の用法は我々も気を付けないとなあと言う感じがする
